OK, here it is folks, the punch line of the meeting the AG had with Killary’s wife…billary…..lol…..
“[recusal] would mean that I wouldn’t even be briefed on what the findings were, or what the actions going forward would be. And while I don’t have a role in those findings … or making those recommendations on how to go forward, I will be briefed on it, and I will be accepting their recommendations.”
She will step aside, but will NOT recuse herself…….lmao…the punchline, I knew it was there, I just didn’t see until now…..omg…..we have been had again……they just keep dishing it out……..
We’ve withheld presenting any consideration the Clinton/Lynch meeting in Arizona until AG Lynch presented her thoughts/explanations on the event.
As you can see in this interview (below) directly discussing the matter Attorney General Lynch goes to great lengths to walk through the parseltongue politispeak surrounding her meeting with Bill Clinton.
Pay attention to the phrases she is using. Specifically note the frequency of: “raises questions and concerns”, and “casts a shadow over how this case may be perceived”. Those phrases alone make the ethical case for recusal.
However, against the call for her to recuse herself the next key phrase to focus on is: “would mean that I wouldn’t even be briefed on what the findings were, or what the actions going forward would be. And while I don’t have a role in those findings or making those recommendations on how to go forward, I will be…
View original post 174 more words