VIDEO MB Obama Selects Gun Grabber For His SCOTUS Nominee – 5 Facts You Need To Know

Vincent Andersen said, and I quote:
“Obama did not seek, as required by the Constitution, the advice of the Senate, except as a political stunt.”

The Senate is not required under the Constitution to have an “up or down vote”.
They CAN simply say no. 
It’s not a moral issue, it’s a political issue. 
I think they SHOULD vote (against him), but to give the most divisive president of my lifetime some kind of moral high ground is a leap into the abyss.

Not that Biden’s words mean anything, but great video for refuting Obama’s selection…..let the new President TRUMP nominate a conservative judge, not an establishment junkie to fill the post…….Garland is beholden to the Clinton’s for where he is today and that is tragic and disastrous for the USA……the Clinton’s are known criminals…..WAKE UP AMERICA….NO, emphatically NO, do not vote this man in as SCOTUS….this is a vote for islamic rule in this country…….do the research and find out…..if this Garland is appointed to the Supreme Court he is beholden to Obama, Obama wants to replace Banki Moon with himself as head of the UN….that would put Obama as head leader of the muslims and islamic rule…this is a dangerous decision……PLEASE rethink your position on this nominee….unless of course you wish to live under Sharia Law. TheFinder http://www.bloggersholiday.blogspot.com

Reclaim Our Republic

Expected to overturn Scalia ruling on 2nd Amendment if confirmed

Obama Selects 2nd Amendment Foe for Supreme Court

Mar 16, 2016 by Kurt Nimmo

Judge Merrick Garland, Obama’s pick to replace the late Antonin Scalia, “has a very liberal view of gun rights,” according to Judicial Crisis Network (JNC), a judicial group run by a former law clerk for Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas.

Garland is the chief judge of the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. He was nominated by Bill Clinton. Garland’s nomination languished in the Republican controlled Senate until after the 1996 election.

Republicans did not specifically object to Garland’s liberal views, but rather said the DC court did not need another judge and objected to the additional “cost to taxpayers of $1 million a year,” according to Senator Chuck Grassley.

As deputy assistant attorney general in the Criminal Division of the Clinton Justice Department, Garland supervised the prosecutions of…

View original post 841 more words

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s